<link>
An expected outcome from each state's Democratic primary or caucus between candidates is a declared winner.
While awaiting the Indiana and North Carolina election returns on May 6, 2008, hands down the most revealing result of the evening came from a heated exchange between CNN Democratic consultants Donna Brazile and Paul Begala, with the money quote coming from Brazile:
... I have worked on a lot of Democratic campaigns, and I respect Paul. But, Paul, you're looking at the old coalition. A new Democratic coalition is younger. It is more urban, as well as suburban, and we don't have to just rely on white blue-collar voters and Hispanics. We need to look at the Democratic Party, expand the party, expand the base and not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Anyone who was not stunned, or as Jerome Armstrong wrote, "flabbergasted", by Brazile's words should be.
Speculation will go on for days about what she meant by a "new Democratic coalition". Hold on to that thought while we take a trip in the Wayback Machine, as RezkoWatch is often wont to do.
It's July 27, 2004, when Barack Obama, then Democratic U.S. Senate nominee for Illinois, was chosen to give the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in Boston.
The event "took on the airs of a coronation," Nicholas Stix wrote August 9, 2004, in EnterStageRight, adding
The worshipful tone of establishment media Obama stories has made it clear that for the lords of the media-political complex, the Senate is but the beginning of the road for Obama, a road that many power brokers would like to see culminate at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Did you get that? Obama's road to the White House was already being paved in July 2004, months before his election to the U.S. Senate was assured.
As Stix indicated, the plan for Obama's media "coronation" had, indeed, already been set in motion; it was well-planned, originating with a source well-known to many in the Democratic Party, while, at the same time, it was hidden in plain sight and unsuspected by nearly all except perhaps the Party elites.
It's now February 18, 2004, the day after presidential candidate Howard Dean's third place showing in the Wisconsin primary and he drops out of the race.
Back in January 2004, following a third place showing in the Iowa Democratic caucus, Dean had let out what has come to be known as the "Dean Scream," the beginning of the end for his presidential aspirations.
Moving forward, it's now March 16, 2004, and Obama has won the Illinois primary for the Democratic nomination to the U.S. Senate.
Even now, the media coverage is described as "fauning" while the "value" of Obama's "organization" is being admired. (RezkoWatch has gone into great detail outlining some of the sources of that "organization," including funds raised by indicted political fixer Antoin "Tony" Rezko, the Alliance of Business Leaders and Entrepreneurs, and many others on his behalf.)
It's now May 12, 2004. It is announced Barack Obama is selected as one of the "Dean Dozen". Howard Dean writes:
Several months ago I put out a call to the hundreds of thousands of grassroots activists who had worked on my campaign to run for office themselves. Hundreds of volunteers answered this call. Our new organization - Democracy for America - is dedicated to using its resources to support those candidates in their fight to take our country back from the right-wing conservatives who dominate our government. Today, Democracy for America announces the Dean Dozen - twelve diverse candidates that represent the spirit of grassroots democracy.
Need proof that the plan was in play before Dean's formal announcement of the "Dean Dozen"? Listed under Obama's name we find this:
In the race to regain control of the U.S. Senate, Democrats have few better chances to pick up a seat than in Illinois. DFA volunteers all over Illinois helped Obama win his primary [on March 16, 2004], now it's time to help him win the general. Stay tuned: I will be on the trail with Barack soon.
At least one blogger notices that Barack Obama's campaign blog is being run "by some of the same people who were involved with the Howard Dean adventure." The plan is in play.
It's now June 1, 2004, and a blogger comments about the Obama campaign blog's Memorial Day event schedule: "I guess my question is how old time democrats are responding to the influx of 'Dean Heads' (yes I know all Obama supporters are not Dean Heads) at these and other events?"—then asks "What happens if the 'Dean Heads' develop real power in the Democratic Party in Illinois?"
The plan is moving forward, as should be obvious. Don't believe it?
Well, here it comes, the Barack Obama campaign plan of today.
Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, the Obama campaigns for 2004 and 2008 gained significant momentum following the embarrassment and humiliating loss by a single candidate early in the 2003-2004 primary season—Howard Dean.
The strategy for Obama's current campaign appears to have come straight from Howard Dean's playbook, which was explained in some detail in a study published in April 2004 by a journalism and media studies professor at a prominent U.S. university who conducted extensive research using press releases, emails to supporters and issued by MoveOn.org, political ads, interviews, ground study, media reports, and other data during the 2003-2004 U.S. presidential primary between November 2003 and March 3, 2004, the date of the ten-state Super primary.
It is as clear as day.
Howard Dean drops out of the presidential race on February 18, 2004.
Super Tuesday is on March 3, 2004.
By this time, the plan is in hand and already in motion. Within weeks, Illinois bloggers are aware that Dean bloggers are at the helm of Obama's campaign blog and "Dean Heads" are showing up at Obama campaign events.
Is there more to this story?
Absolutely. But for now, the following highlights from an obscure study clearly indicate how the plan for Obama's candidacy evolved from Dean's 2003-2004 primary campaign.
It should also be obvious that Dean's stamp is clearly imprinted on Obama's campaign, a fulfillment of Dean's dream towards what Donna Brazile referred to on May 6, 2008, as a "new coalition"—it is grounded in the plan.
Please note that the study says nothing about how to actually win an election, just how to manipulate voters and the mass media.
The Plan
#1: Influentials
The "ten percent of the U.S. population who engage in two-step-flow, or tell their neighbors 'what to buy, what politicians to support, where to vacation'."
Engaged in "making a political contribution to a candidate or political party, reading political email; forwarding it on, visiting a political web log, participating in a political chat room or visiting a news site for political information."
"A far larger percentage of them than the public at large is concerned that interest groups wield too much influence in the political process."
#2: Web influentials
"Democratic outsiders, not sponsored by major political parties, or traditional Democratic interest groups."
Develop "new forms of participatory political advertising, which can influence [and] shape press coverage and voter perceptions of political candidates." Note: Asked in question format, the rest of the "plan" makes it clear this is the goal.
Individuals committed to the whole, with "social capital, or enhanced connections between people and groups."
"[O]nline innovators sought to inform and activate their members, and bring them together in the real world."
#3: Small donor campaign contributions
Build campaign around "contributions given by small donors, whose help you also rely on for grassroots organization."
"All fundraising involves dialogue."
#4: Candidate
"[E]ssentially no national name recognition."
Personality for public office.
Able to "handle the stress of a frontrunner presidential campaign."
Prepared for the "problems" that would be encountered in the "world of traditional presidential level campaigning" and able to "balance" "obligations on the ground, in the air, the real world of campaigning."
#5: Funding
"Financial support from a broad network of small donors would draw press attention that would develop campaign momentum that would mean ever increasing funding."
Replace the "large Democratic contributors" with "small ones."
527 political action committees: "Such groups can raise unlimited amounts of money from domestic donors, as long as they do not specifically advocate the election of a particular candidate." Can recruit activists.
#6: Change the media landscape, create a movement
"[S]et the public policy agenda."
Create a new culture "which will be better because it will contain more variety in unity—it will be a tapestry in which more strands have been woven together. .. not just plain talk, but action ... with greater numbers of young people" participating in politics.
Web "personalization and interactivity" as opposed to DNC "party unity" and "inclusiveness".
"[A]ccelerated primary schedule" to "produce a single strong party candidate for the presidency an unprecedented eight months before the election."
Use "Web networks to create cyberflora fostering information exchange and public debate."
Draw on and disseminate "arguments and positions relating to political change, using serious and frivolous symbolic languages—making the case to their audiences that change can be both creative and patriotic."
Create a "mainstream press echo chamber."
Get "liberal commentators" on board.
Create "talk radio echo chamber" that will lead to opportunities for press coverage.
Create a "web echo chamber."
Combine the "possibilities for experimentation and grassroots participation which arise due to Internet availability with experienced ground organization" with training and "centralized management."
