To Pruednce or whoever you are,

To tell someone they are on the path to being physically abused because the person they are with has a problem with their past is one of the most irresponsible things I have ever heard...Especially coming from someone who pawns themselves off as a knowledgeable person who advice should be taken from....You know nothing about this guy except he obviuosly dosent like thinking about his future spouse being sexually active with other people...Ive got news for you most dont want to think about how many people their spouse has slept with...The only thing him asking about the past proves is that he is uncomfortable with the thought of it...Which most are....Im quite sure they will get past it ....Maybe you just have such an undesireable past of your own you are personally self concious about someone asking about it...Either way your advice that he is on the path to being physically abusive is irresponsible and perhaps you should pick another line of work if this is the level of talent you have in this area...

of the idiots I'm referring to in my top-post above.

I guess you're fine with that whole "unlawful restraint" thingie, too?

I recommend self-castration; your genetic contribution is not conducive to the overall improvement of the gene-pool.

Reality14:

he obviuosly dosent like thinking about his future spouse being sexually active with other people...I

How about he just doesn't think about it? He's getting divorced. Obviously he's been sexually active, too.

If the asshole guy doesn't like thinking about his future spouse being sexually active with other people, then why the hell does he constantly bring it up & interrogate her about it? If he doesn't like to think about it, then why does he hear play by play details?

What the fuck, Chuck? Is this goddamned post ever going to die? This topic has attracted a swarm of imbecilic, brain-dead, West Virginia-bred morons like skeeters to a puddle of fresh blood.

I don't know what's worse: the defense of the actions of the abusive (yes, dickbrain, read it: abusive) party mentioned in the letter, or the avoidance or bizarre interpretation of the impossible-to-miss references in the letter to detention and threat during questioning.

Reality14 - with all due respect...are you completely fucking retarded? Did you read the letter? Is it, in your view, an acceptable activity to physically restrain and detain a woman (or anyone, for that matter) and grill her about ex-boyfriends, or do your language comprehension skills stop short of understanding what was written? The letter has nothing to do with her past, you dribble-sotted fuckwit. It has to do with the boyfriends' treatment of her while looking into it. Do you get it, Special Bus?

Given I believe these letters are not-too-clever fakery created by the Slate staff for entertainment purposes, the letter in question is all the more completely immaterial. Unless your response is similarly spoofed by Slate to get a rise from the Fray, I'd say you are at least moderately unscrewed. Go take your Lithium, psycho.

clapclapclap

See, this is why you're my heeeero, schuyler.

Sigh. Can I use that one at the next community board meeting? Please?

I'll even pay royalties.

They're everywhere today! I couldn't resists THIS one.