Re: The Ongoing Obama VP Contest: Name Your Top 10.
by
dsimon
05/12/2008, 4:29 PM #
I don't like the idea of Warner or Webb. Warner isn't even in Washington (yet), so he has no DC experience at all. If Obama's perceived need is national security cred, Warner doesn't give it to him.
Webb does, but he just narrowly won his Senate seat. I'd rather see him stay there.
I might have said Rendell a few months ago, but he really disappointed me during the PA primary. It's not that he supported Clinton, which he had every right to do; it's that he parroted the campaign's plainly invalid arguments (e.g. winning primaries in big and battleground states make her the better candidate in the general election). I admired him when he was mayor in Philly while I was there, but the specious claims he made during the primary I believe show a lack of integrity; to me, he came off as a lightweight.
Clark might be a good choice; can't get much better national security than that. Can come off as a little flaky in person, though. Doesn't matter to me, but it might to others.
Bayh might be a good way to assuage Clinton supporters (for those who think it necessary) and get a swing stater on the ticket. But could Dems hold onto the Indiana Senate seat?
As for the others, I still think Nunn would be an extremely good call. Big national security cred, a southerner, a moderate, tons of "experience" for those who think it's important. And Dems wouldn't have to give up any seats. Care to explain why he's not further up the list?
I like Biden, but I wonder how good he'd be in the #2 role. "Subservient" is not a word that comes to mind when I think of him. He'd make a good Secretary of State, though.