Go to Ask.com


enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Why NO feminist should vote for McCain
by Thevail
+1/-2 Reply

Right now Hillary Clinton's feminist supporters are very angry at Barack Obama for "beating" the first truly viable female candidate, HRC.

But do you really think that somehow John McCain is "'less male" or that he wouldn't have tried his damndest to "beat" Hillary if he were the one running against her?

While winding his way slowly to the democratic nomination Obama has at least been a gentleman about it. People keep asking, "where's the knockout punch", why can't he "seal the deal against Hillary Clinton?"

But, where she has been free to berate his experience, he ran straight into the feminist fence. Much of HRC's experience is "first ladying".

He could have said, "I don't think an advantageous marriage to a great leader really qualifies one as experience."

He could have turned the statistics around and said, "If only the least eductaed support her, well you have to wonder about her policies, don't you.

He could have said, "If she really is going to reflect the ideals and attitudes of her core constituents once she's elected, do we really want an American President making world altering decisions about some of the most important and frightening problems America has ever faced based on the ideas of the least educated amongst us?"

He could have called her on the carpet as the worst sort of old school politician for raising the race and "elitist" ideas just to get votes. And then pointed out that apparently she doesn't mind dividing and caricaturing the American public just for her own personal power.

BUT HE DIDN'T.

He could be actively belittling her NOW in her futile chase for the nomination and flat out saying, she's going to try to disenfranchise EVERY person who voted for me in some filthy, typical, backroom deal.

HE ISN'T

John McCain has a long and illustrious career of pandering and flip flopping in both politics and his personal life.

Not only did he just VOTE AGAINST the equal pay for equal work bill that would have benefitted women immensely....

In 1979, John McCain came face to face with his future.

He was in Hawaii, attending a military reception. While there, he met a young, blond, former cheerleader named Cindy Hensley.

It was an incredible stroke of luck for McCain.

How fortunate could one man be? Here was McCain, who had his eye on Congress, meeting a young, attractive beer heiress from Arizona, which was adding a congressional district in 1982.

McCain recalls that both he and Cindy fudged their ages at first. McCain made himself a little younger and Cindy made herself a little older. They found out their real ages when the local paper published them. McCain was 43, Cindy 25.

''So our marriage,'' McCain cracks, ''is really based on a tissue of lies.''

While they were dating, McCain called Cindy from Beijing, where he was traveling with a contingent from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee while she was in the hospital recuperating from minor knee surgery. She thanked him for the lovely flowers in her room, sent from ''John.''

What McCain didn't tell Cindy was that he hadn't sent the flowers. They were from another John, who lived in Tucson.

''I never thanked him,'' Cindy notes with a grin.

After a whirlwind courtship, John asked Cindy to marry him. But there were some details to clear out of the way.

McCain needed a divorce from his wife of 14 years, Carol, who had been badly injured in a car accident while McCain languished in Hanoi.

The marriage had been strained by his years of absence, along with McCain's admitted affairs after returning from Vietnam.

In February 1980, less than a year after he met Cindy, McCain petitioned a Florida court to dissolve his marriage to Carol, calling the union ''irretrievably broken.'' Bud Day, a lawyer and fellow POW, handled the case.

Re: Why NO feminist should vote for McCain
by spiker

You know what this begs for: a post pulling out all of Obama's juiciest book quotes.

I think all the choices this time around suck, just like they did in '00 and in '04.

Biden, Dodd, Bloomberg, Easely,... there are any number of people far less flawed (though still flawed) than Obama or McCain who never run. Why is that?

Bill Gates '08 or Linus Torvalds '08.

Geeks have made the world far better by doing the grunt work. Maybe it's time they started to rule the world.

Yes, indeed. Just because
by Gatewood

between them the press and the DNC have conspired to destroy Hillary's campaign and to label her a racist is no reason to become angry at Obama or the Democratic Party [the DNC].

On the other hand, the DNC cannot pull strings, rig rules, or practice extortion or blackmail for Obama's benefit in the general election and, based on past elections, it's very likely that the press will switch over to actively campaigning for McCain against Obama.

So . . . which group do you reward for destroying Hillary's campaign? Do you reward the press by voting for McCain or do you reward Obama and the DNC?

Well, you could just vote your conscience. Or you could vote for whichever group has made you less angry. Or you could simply withdraw your vote altogether and see what happens. That last option would make BOTH the press and the DNC squeal in pain.

Possibilities, possibilities. What will bitter old women [as described by the press and the DNC in their efforts to promote Obama] do?

Obamacrats have utterly no sense of
by Gatewood

balance when it comes to promoting Barack Obama. Unfortunately for them that will not help them win back enraged feminists who watched the corrupt DNC and the biased press methodically sabotage Hillary's campaign for Obama's benefit.

Until that issue is addressed, and admitted to actually having happened, Obamacrats can probably continue to whistle for support from feminists and will continue to be ignored.

I'm a feminist that might vote for McCain
by myopinion4

Gatewood is correct.

If Hillary Clinton does not win the nomination, I will have to see who each candidates running mates are.

McCain could kick the bucket- So could Obama etc.

The reason this lifelong democrat would vote for McCain would be "the lesser of two evils" theory.

McCain is experienced and moderate like Hillary. He almost went Independent in 2001. I have other issues as a woman that are important to me than Roe v Wade.

My vote would be to reject and rebuke the DNC and the Obama campaign and the Media and the vitoral, radical Obama supporters I've encountered throughout the campaign that seem to keep saying "we will all come together in the fall."

I never considered my self a feminist until this campaign progressed. Just a moderate democrat.

I won't vote Obama after the sexism I've seen by all of the above. Not me, not millions of others. You reap what you sow.

Try again DNC. I'm out until further notice.

View as RSS news feed in XML