Inquiring minds want to know.... !!!

In intel speak that defines someone who comes into a country and stays for a long time, becomes even a "citizen" if necessary, goes about their everyday activities, until their "handlers" trigger them into open and overt activities.

In other words and in plain speak language, does Obama have a "hidden agenda" that only he and his "handlers" know to activate once he were to be sworn into POTUS office ? Handlers do not mean those individuals who are currently heading up his campaign staff. They would not know of his "other handlers" at all.

Of course, such an occurrence is at this point in time, a 50-50 proposition...but what the heck...once in, then the game is "ON".

Here is an example of his ruthlessness in gaining the Illinois State senate seat:

(1)

<link>

(2)

http://www.theobamafile.com/

(3)

<link>

(4)

<link>

The above sites/files only gives a small indication of the background that is part and parcel of Obama's supreme effort to gaining possession of the most powerful office in the entire world, the POTUS...and commanding the most powerful military-industrial complex in the entire world...as Commander-In-Chief.

I wonder what the various generals of the military industrial complex would think if there was any "hint" that the person of BHO sitting in the White House would use the military for his own "hidden agenda" decisions...not for the benefit of the US, but instead for the benefit of Islam, muslims in the Middle East and in Kenya, Africa.

Remember, on a campaign you can say a lot of things that you definitely know you won't intend to do once in office. History has a lot of examples of individuals who have behaved that way.

You decide...but the DNC, Dean, Brazile, and Nancy Pelosi have seriously failed to do their vetting of an american citizen who also holds dual citizenship as an African Kenyan citizen.

Is Barack Obama a "sleeper agent" for another state, nation, government?

I am a Dolphin...living in the depths of the collective unconscious, and looking into the crystal ball on occasion.

And that makes almost as much sense as asserting that McCain is a sleeper because he was born in Panama (I think it was, I didn't look it up for certain)

-- or maybe, as I read some right-wing crank suggest, he was programmed as a Manchurian Candidate during his captivity in Hanoi.

All sounds like bullshit to me!

vets.... they favor dogs.

jo

Wanna ride down ????

=======

"...For a year, he also minimized his relationship with Rezko by telling the media that he only had dinner or lunch with Rezko one or twice a year.

But when confronted by Sun-Times reporters during the March 14 interview, with the allegation that an FBI mole saw him coming and going to Rezko’s office often and that three sources said he talked to Rezko on the phone daily, Obama changed his tune.

Now the story is that he may have talked to Rezko daily at times during campaigns but sometimes he went for a whole month without talking to him. “I have to say we're talking over the course of 10 years,” Obama said, “there might have been spurts where I talked to him daily.”

But then he added: "There might have been stretches over a month where I wouldn't have talked to him at all."

This story is a far cry from the picture Obama gave to the public of him and Rezko meeting once or twice a year, and he never did respond to the allegation by the Times reporter that an FBI mole “saw you coming and going from Rezko’s office a lot.“

Without Rezko's fundraising, Obama would not have been elected to the Illinois senate, or the US Senate, and he would not have sold the books he wrote about himself because like the Wizard of Oz, Obama is nobody special.

Even with Rezko's massive fund raising, Obama could not beat former Black Panther, Bobby Rush, in his 2000 bid for a seat in Congress in the House.

And the only reason he won the US Senate race was because his viable opponents had to drop out due to the public airing of personal scandals. Beating Alan Keyes is hardly a victory to brag about.

======

Nadhmi Aochi and relationship to Rezko and Obama...

<link>

<link>

also...

Rezko's relationship with Barack Obama goes back to at least 1990, when Obama's law firm did work relating to a Rezko housing development. Rezko was a key early-money fund raiser in Obama's state Senate campaigns and his failed run at the US Congress. In June 2005, when the mansion was purchased, Rezko was widely known to be under federal investigation. Rezko also is a key fundraiser for Illinois Democratic Governor Rod Blagojevich.

The sudden emergence of Auchi into this story indicates Rezko's deals may include a money trail leading back to dead Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Auchi's Saddam links trace back to a failed 1959 assassination attempt on the life of then-Iraqi-prime-minister Abdul Karim Qasim.

Auchi's General Mediterranean Holdings company was also the largest private shareholder in Banque Nationale de Paris which later merged with Paribas to become BNP Paribas. At Saddam's insistence, billions of dollars of Oil for Food transactions passed through BNP from its 1995 inception until 2001.

<link>

i am reminded of the movie "the manchurian candidate"

the original one, starring lawrence harvey, not the dreadful remake with denzel washington.

but not for the reasons that would first come to your mind

actually! But I have to agree that he has not been vetted carefully enough. There is still just too much that w do not know about him.

And he should have given up his Kenyan citizenship a long, long time ago. The fact that he hasn't, just says to me, "Another example of bad judgment on Obama's part."

You can't be President of the United States if you weren't born a citizen of the United States.

You can't "Become" a citizen.

But then again, I recognize you wrote your peice for people even dumber than you are.

If we are going to play with sleeper fantasies...the guy who was kept in a cage and brainwashed by the Commies for many years is the one you have to watch.

Don't you go to the movies?

To me, one of the most interesting things about Archetypes in the Collective Unconscious is that they are unchangeable, immutable. That is their nature - they represent an energy that is pure.

So should you identify with a Dolphin, living in the depths of the Collective Unconscious, then you'd be identifying with a mammal totally adapted to life in a foreign world -- an air breather leaving always under the water and yet for life having to move to the other world in order to get the necessary "breath."

Your identification with this archetype doesn't necessitate an anthropomorphization of the Dolphin into a "Flipper" or other trained Dolphin, like one you might see at Sea World. Rather, as an archetype the dolphin would be a symbol of a constant state of reconciliation between two disparate worlds - living in a kind of inalienable state of tension and conflict.

While we humans may project our delight onto Dolphins, both in the wild and in captivity, that has no bearing on the animal in the water or the Archetype in the Collective Unconscious. Archetypes are neither good nor bad, they just are.

The whole idea of "looking into the crystal ball on occasion" is a mixing up of metaphors.

JMHO, of course.