The Black community is expert at tearing down it's Black Men, from children who dis Daddy, to womenfolk who dismiss their menfolk contemptuously, to "Black on Black" street violence and Black racism directed not just at Whites, but at other Blacks as well. You can see this everywhere you look in our "post-Martin Luther King's success" American social structure. White males like myself cannot speak to the failure to develop Black men who share our outlook on this disgraceful and disrepectful culture, without fear of being tagged by that awful scarlet letter weapon word: Racist. So, to speak plainly, let me accept the appellation for this screed only, so that I might write plainly and without hesitation. Obama may be "just like me" in his fairly privileged education and background, but he has to speak for the masses of frustrated and put upon Blacks, who find their cultural nexus in places like the South Side of Urban Chicago, in the Los Angeles Watts neighborhood, in New York's Harlem area, and in urban places like St. Louis/East St. Louis, Atlanta, New Orleans, and Boston among other locales (Baltimore and Washington DC also come to mind.)

One of the hallmarks of Black culture, as it seems to me, is "GroupThink." In other words, "think like us" or suffer the consequences. Of course, politics lends itself to this art form of Michelle Obama and Louis Farrakahan and others, precisely because politics is the realm of "the low art" of GroupThink. Our politics are being rendered into the "lowest common denominator" result by way of our 24-hour media coverage, our sound bite modern day journalism, our ideologically natured political parties, and our insipid American political leaders of the moment.

Periodically, minorities in America have achieved some modicum of needed political power by means of politics, because ultimately, in a democracy, the votes of many outweigh the thoughts and votes of the few. However, this was always a local phenomenon, in large measure, that occurred in urban areas, many of which we speak today. Wars and revolutions in France, for example, always seemed to foment and spring forth across the Countryside, from Paris, that Nation's Capital City under French kings who consolidated their Nation State powers at the expense of outlying cities and areas, much the way Spain became a Nation State, and English monarchic authority was gained at the expense of other landed and positioned families and lesser urban centers. Italy was not run from Rome until quite recently, late to the modernist Nation State methodology, although plenty of Italian wars originated in Rome, to the detriment of surrounding kingdoms and principalities. Germany for another example, was quite late to the modernist Nation Statist conceit.

America had a dynamism that derived from its newness as a nation, it's lack of centralized Nation Statist structures, which devolved political power to autonomous regions, states and urban areas. Our economy and culture are now withering, precisely because we have succeeded at diminishing our own dynamism.

The best example of this, in my view, is the U.S. Senate Democrats' decades long resistance to the idea that we need to provision for our American Future. We had people who created Niagra Falls power stations, based on new electrical generation technologies, in anticipation of the great growth of New York City and environs. We had domestic oil provisioners which enabled our car culture, long before we had to move overseas to find these resources. We built highways and cities and companies and a great American culture of family and tradition and work and civilization to rival anything before seen in the World, and all in a mere 200 years of American history.

So what happened? In my view, the Democratic Party became profoundly anti-Male. This ideological horror has been perpetrated in many subtle and none too subtle ways, over decades now, and it is essentially destroying the family structure and dynamism of the America we inherited.

Why is it, that only the men who grow up Fatherless, such as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, prove palatable to the electoral tastes of the Democratic Party electorate?

Why all this Democratic Party emphasis on so-called Feminist issues? Why are the female politicians proving to be so badgering, so sniping, so imperious, so harpie? Think Bella Abzug. Think of that belligerent female Senator from Pennsylvania or Ohio - M ____. The Feminist interest groups in the Democratic Party recently required both Obama and Clinton to pledge once again, and quite publicly, their fealty to the pro-Abort Feminist standard position, which holds that abortion is a matter of convenience, falls within the purview of government policy, and in any case is a private matter between the pregnant woman and her doctor, even if that doctor is provided by a school or court system to a minor, absent parental involvement. Talk about twisted.

As to AIDS, I never see reference to the Canadian "gay" airline steward, as reported in an important article published years ago in California magazine, which outlined this irresponsible man's single handed and quite brazen, methodical, and malicious spreading of the AIDS virus to the California coastline, practically single handed. He would engage in his sexual endeavors with numerous innocent victims, arise from the assignation the following morning, and on his way out the door announce, that he had "gay cancer" and that "now, you do, too." He was speaking of his mortally infectious condition now known as AIDS.

As to the defeat of Separate But Equal, under the assault of Martin Luther King from deep South Atlanta, by way of Chicago's South Side, that conquest was achieved, like Abortion, not on the merits, but rather because the Black Doorman of the U.S.Senate had been procuring underaged Black females for U.S. Senate Majority Leader and now President Lyndon Baines Johnson for many years, and now was calling in the political chit in a blackmail situation. Why else would a Southerner like Johnson contravene his entire political party and Southern compatriots, throw his Democratic Party over in rack and ruin to the Republicans for generations of electoral college successes, and open the door to demigods like the ACLU and NAACP and all the warp and woof and our current Democratic Party fabric? The Democratic Party is an ongoing disaster zone, directly as a result of this "holiday" we now memorialize as Martin Luther King Day. Any State in the Union that opposes making this holiday official, suffers the Democratic and now Republican Party consequences, but it has proven to be an utter, complete disaster not just for our politics, our culture, and our Country, but for our children, quite evidently. Draw your own conclusions, if you are old enough to compare.

Two more examples. Why is the Ohio Democratic Governor and Party apparatus forcing the resignation of the Democratic State Attorney General? He did nothing wrong, save to offend Feminist sensibilities. What is wrong with guys being guys, I ask? Apparently, enough that you cannot hold office, even one you have been elected to, without falling afoul of the Democratic Party in Ohio. Who the heck do they think they are, these party politicians, that they can sack a duly elected State of Ohio official? He is and should remain the chief legal officer of the State of Ohio. What Ohio voters should do, is take note of the Ohio politicians who continue their assaults on their elected official, due to petty and small minded, ideological advantage seeking, so they can vote against these interests again and again in future Ohio elections.

Today, please note, the Democratic Party in the State of New Hampshire remains utterly and completely silent, from Jeanne Shaheen and Kathy Sullivan and Governor John Lynch on down the line, about the ongoing and vicious legal prosecution, harrassment, and vindictive destruction of their Democratic Party U.S. Congressional Candidate, Gary Dodd, who was not only convicted of a felony charge recently in New Hampshire, but then arrested today in the State of Florida, presumably for "violating the terms of his (probation/parole)" and exhibiting "erratic behavior." Well, if it is a sin or a breach of Democratic Party etiquette or a violation of any other sort, to engage in "erratic behavior" so-called, then how many of us stand a chance against the all-encompassing powers of The State? Shades of George Orwell's book, "1984" today, in 2008.

The nuttiness of the Democratic Party merits whole volumes of a continuing comic book series, but I have run out of time in my exegesis today.