Wasn't it sort of funny that Obama was ahead by six percent with 95% in--and only one precinct left. Did Hillary win one precinct by 90% or is Guam a County in Texas?

No, I suspect that it is just an artifact of the statistics of small samples. There were 4500 votes cast in 21 precincts or only 200 votes per precinct on average.

I do hope that Guam will put to rest the new Hillary Clinton nomination rule that the candidate with the "momentum" in the last few races deserves the nomination. <eyes roll>

Obama 08!

No -- but most Americans couldn't answer that question with confidence.

We are all clear, aren't we, that Obama won Texas?? After all the primary votes and caucus votes were counted, OBAMA WON TEXAS. Hillary DID NOT win Texas. Obama walks away with more won delegates in Texas.... ergo, HE WON TEXAS. PERIOD.

er, not, Ms. Independent. Texas is the only state which decided people could vote twice. That is grossly unfair to everyone--the elderly, the infirmed, those working folk with families, etc., to "caucus" that night, even though they had already voted once. Reports of chaos have abounded of that night. It wasn't right. Other states were not allowed to vote twice. For all of these reasons, the general grownups have listed Texas in the Clinton column because she solidly won the primary--and voters were not allowed to vote in the caucus unless they had voted in the primary.

Understand now?

Hillary Clinton Rule #1: If a circumstance doesn't favor Hillary Clinton then it is unfair.

Caucuses - unfair!

Small states - unfair!

Red states - unfair!

Black vote - unfair!

Michigan - unfair!

Florida - unfair!

Texas - unfair!

"Activists" - unfair!

DNC rules - unfair!

"Pledged" delegates - unfair!

"Super" delegates - unfair!

Barack Obama - unfair!

Obama 08!