I've been reading Slate for a long time, probably about 7-8 years. Sometimes the titles are silly or dumb, but this one is just totally absurb. Not only is the article not about Steve Jobs - he's referenced in only one tangential line - but the reference related Iron Man to Steve Jobs in a way that the rest of the article doesn't. The article is about Iron Man the Capitalist, whereas the article's fleeting reference to Steve Jobs is as a lone paradigm-shifting genius-inventor. Good article, but some copy editor really dropped the ball on this one.

Could not agree more.