enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 5 (67 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Was your mother a lying opportunist?
by doodahman
+7/-3 Reply

Mine wasn't. Mine also didn't sit on Walmart's board for ten years and then claim to have spent her life fighting for working people. My mother wouldn't have tolerated serial philandering from my father, who himself wouldn't have engaged in such behavior. In addition, if she decided to run for office, she wouldn't have to go as far as New York to find a seat she could possibly win, she'd just stay where people knew her, in Chicago. Oh, and my mother wouldn't try to smear somebody with charges that she admitted are baseless just by pretending its some sort of "vetting" process. And finally, my mother wouldn't wouldn't act like a goddamn Republican and attempt to destroy the party just because she couldn't win the nomination.

So, no, Hillary doesn't remind me of my mother. And, unless your mother was Richard Nixon, I doubt she'd remind you of your mother, either.

Re: Was your mother a lying opportunist?
by Schroeder Baker
Oh, c'mon. Hillary doesn't "act like a goddamn Republican," she acts like herself. ROFL
Well said, dood.
by rundeep
Hope you are keeping well.
Re: Well said, dood.
by doodahman

rundeep:
Hope you are keeping well.

Well enough, beautiful. Hope the same for you.

It really isn't about anyone's Mom.
by JackD
The truth seems to be that, gender be damned, not to mention marital or parental status, the majority of humans out there can be collected under the category (coined by my first boss) of "first class prick." Admittedly, this was prior to the onslaught of political correctness and, then, the alternative phrasing might grate a bit. The objection to Hillary has nothing to do with anyone's Mom. It has to do with her being part of the majority of humans.
Re: Was your mother a lying opportunist?
by run75441

dood:

You around the next few weeks? I need to bail for a bit and was thinking of coming in to Chicago.

Re: It really isn't about anyone's Mom.
by run75441
welcome back
Re: It really isn't about anyone's Mom.
by JackD
Thanks. Let me know if you're going to show up.
Re: It really isn't about anyone's Mom.
by run75441

Jack:

Of course. I need to check with my son to see if he is around and then plan.

What about your dad?
by FieldingBandolier

When guys do most of that stuff, we call them "ambitious" or "driven".


Re: What about your dad?
by NightSwimmer

No.

A prick's a prick.

Re: Was your mother a lying opportunist?
by doodahman
run75441:

dood:

You around the next few weeks? I need to bail for a bit and was thinking of coming in to Chicago.

Of course, Run. As long as you don't mind dodging a little gun fire. The Cobras and the Kings are having a little spat and my apartment's a bit in the middle.

It'll be fun.

Re: It really isn't about anyone's Mom.
by doodahman

JackD:
The truth seems to be that, gender be damned, not to mention marital or parental status, the majority of humans out there can be collected under the category (coined by my first boss) of "first class prick." Admittedly, this was prior to the onslaught of political correctness and, then, the alternative phrasing might grate a bit. The objection to Hillary has nothing to do with anyone's Mom. It has to do with her being part of the majority of humans.

Everyone is a prick at some time or another, including moi-- yes, yes, it's true.

But that woman made it her life's work. Not to mention the fact that it grates the living shit out of me that some corporate shyster and Walmart boardmember pretends to be some kind of working class hero. That alone means she considers me and the rest of the electorate to be ignorant and easily manipulated. Given all that, her vagina would be just about the least objectionable feature about her, assuming it isn't just another artificial construction.

No. Maybe that's why
by not_abel

she stayed out of politics.

Lying:

Pandering on NAFTA , Iraq, and religion, minimizing (deceptively) his awareness of Wright's rhetoric and apparent beliefs.

Opportunism:

Parlaying a good speech at the 2004 convention, a brief gig as Senator, and widespread dismay at one of the worst administrations in history into a run for the Oval Office.

I'd say Obama can claim the title of "lying opportunist" as much as anyone else still in the race.

Running on "hope", "change", and "new ideas" isn't, well, a new idea. It's been done, and usually with disappointing results. We probably have a reasonable idea what kind of presidents Clinton or McCain will be. That might be a reason for voting against them, but it's at least as legitimate a reason for voting for them (the devil you know...)

Extra! Extra! Read all about it
by topazz
Page 1 of 5 (67 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML