A correction and a comment.

1. According to RealClear Politics' website, the final popular vote in PA had Clinton winning by 10.$%. So let's stop the silly parsing and innuendo that Clinton did not achieve the desired "double digit victory."

2. Your analysis ignores, or gives short shrift to, the possibility that a major negative event will undermine Obama's candidacy and push the supers to Clinton. Clearly, Clinton sees that as a possibility and feels it as a valid reason to stay in the race. And the recent revelations re: Obama, combined with the fact that we really do not know a lot about the man, make that a reasonable possibility. It also makes it in the interest of the Democratic Party that Clinton stay in the race and keep on the pressure until the whole process runs its course.

Rick-Westlake, OH

You must be a Clinton supporter because, like most Clinton supporters, facts don't seem to matter. You can even cite a source that contradicts what you are asserting. RealClearPolitics states that Clinton won by 9.2%.

<link>

One would think the fact that the Clintons are being sued by Peter Paul for fraud in California would be (to borrow your words) a negative enough event to undermine Clinton's candidacy and push the supers to Obama. (Don't believe me - see paulvclinton.com)

One would also think it would merit some mention in the media.

We may not know a lot about Obama, but we know way too much about the Clintons. Considering the never ending streams of lies, scandals, greed, and selfishness that radiate off of them I can't understand why anyone would continue to support HRC.

Why don't integrity and honesty count anymore?

I hope the remaining primary states and supers "send a message" and just say NO!

No more lies. No more scandals. No more Clintons.

NO!