Not the information I want but . . .
by
dk_brown
05/01/2008, 9:53 AM #
I don't see how LW's boyfriend is pre-stalking. That is a huge, huge jump. I don't like the description of a 2-hour interrogation and I think that seems a bit obsessive but there are other reasons why he might want the details short of being controlling or otherwise insane. Everyone is wired differently and maybe he gets off hearing her sexual past. If she does not share that (not unhealthy at its core) fetish, then they are not necessarily compatible and perhaps should part. If he wants to know because he wants to have completely open books (perhaps his first wife was very, very closed and that was one reason why he is leaving her for the LW), that is not necessarily a problem. I know that this is not the prevailing opinion on the comments but I just think Prudence jumped way to far based on the information in the letter.
[also: I was the teenage letter writer on both sides - when I was 16, my then-girlfriend went to college; when I was 18, my then-girlfriend and I went to college; my wife is that 18-year-old girlfriend but, as the above letter suggests, we had a don't ask, don't tell policy in college. the deal was, if we got involved with someone who impacted our relationship, we'd tell each other person; that was 22 years, 16.5 years of marriage and 4 kids ago]