<<"there has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse" as a consequence of expanded FBI powers under the Patriot Act. We now learn that at the time, he was in possession of at least six FBI reports detailing unlawful surveillance, searches, and improper use of national security letters.>>
"verified" - sounds like what he would say if he read some reports that were not vetted.
"abuse" - sounds like a term he would use if there were possible problems in the program, but they were probably "good faith" mistakes.
I don't doubt the impression he gave to some may have been wrong and his responses"Clintonesque", but that doesn't make him a liar... that makes him a practicing attorney. I have noticed he minces words very much, but no different than most lawyers (especially in front of partisans).
I agree that he, as well as many in the administration, are rather "breezy" about mistakes that are important (Iraq, Some of Katrina...) and "good faith" only goes so far, but I have little doubt his #1 priority after 9/11 was the protection of the American people "at home". Even though we were/are the most "juicy" target to Al Qaeda et al, unless you are a 9/11 conspiracy believer, the Administration must have done something correct thus far.