enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 2 (26 items)   1 2 Next >
Ricci – Objectification, Mirrors, and Speed
by TheBell
+1/-1 Reply

I used to like the young actress Christina Ricci. She struck me as being very smart and a little weird. One would hardly expect anything else from someone who began her acting career as a child playing Wednesday in the Addams Family. However, she has just unleashed a full-fledged Hollywood screed that has me questioning if she is either a little less smart and/or a whole lot more phony than I had previously imagined.

The objectification of women upsets Ricci. The thing particularly galling to her is a growing trend among women finding such an image desirable. She vented all this in a recent interview with Black Book magazine.

“It’s like the highest form of flattery for teenage girls . . . It used to be something that we were sort of ashamed of. You didn’t want to admit it to people if you were a stripper. But now, the hottest thing to say is, ‘I can work a pole!’.”

While I understand the concerns she raises, her diatribe reminded me about a movie that Ricci made in 2006, called Black Snake Moan. I never saw this movie, so I went and looked up several plot summaries and reviews for it and they confirmed what I remembered from the film’s rather lurid posters and trailers.

Black Snake Moan is the simple story of an unsuccessful blues musician turned unsuccessful farmer, played by Samuel L. Jackson. Jackson’s character is having a bad day; his wife has just left him for his younger brother. Then he finds a badly battered young blond girl in the mud next to his driveway, wearing nothing but a cut-off T-shirt and panties. Ricci plays the girl. It turns out she was raped, beaten, and left for dead by a group of men she had met that evening after a fling of abandoned partying, booze, and alcohol.

Jackson’s character suddenly has a purpose in life again and he sets out to nurse the battered girl back to health. It seems that Ricci’s character is the town slut. Sexual abuse by her stepfather, verbal abuse from her mother, and hard treatment from everybody else has made her into a nymphomaniac. She thought she had finally found a man who could make her happy but he is a Marine just sent off on a tour of duty in Iraq. She suffers from bad dreams or repressed memories that cause her to seethe and writhe and from which she can obtain release only by abandoned but meaningless sex.

Jackson’s character is a decent but poor and uneducated fellow, more prone to picking up and reading the Bible than a copy of Psychology Today. Shocked by the girl’s “spells,” he decides she suffers from demonic possession. He decides to cure her and starts by keeping her safe from hurting herself and others. How does he do this? He uses a forty-foot iron chain to bind her to the radiator in the bedroom.

Yes, you read that right. He chains her up while she continues to writhe and moan. Ricci’s dissatisfaction with the desire for objectification by her fellow young women now becomes clearer. Why brag about your prowess “working a pole” when a radiator is available?

Lest you think the musician-turned-farmer is just secretly getting his jollies by acting out bondage fantasies, it seems he really does care about Ricci’s character and wants to help her. He gives her nutritious food, medical attention, and a clean dress to wear (eventually). He pulls out his old guitar and sings to her, as a way to get her mind off her more base desires. On one occasion, when she is feeling especially peckish, he thoughtfully washes her back to calm her.

Yes, you read that last part right, too.

Unbelievably, some respectable, mainstream critics actually liked this movie, partly for its “strong performances” and partly for the It’s a Wonderful Life ending it offers. Ricci’s character comes to like the man holding her captive because he is trying to help her. She stays with him even when he finally unchains her.

Her Marine boyfriend returns from Iraq, now suffering from PTSD. When he first discovers the little household created in his absence, he nearly kills Jackson’s character. However, after help from Jackson, he ends up marrying the girl and the two find the inner strength and self-respect to help each other with their respective problems. Jackson’s character also gets over his wife’s rejection and finds a new love.

Personally, I think I side with the critic who described Black Snake Moan as “nasty, sappy and (unintentionally) amusing . . . bad enough to make wolves howl and gums bleed.” So why the hell would Ricci make such a sexist, misogynistic piece of trash?

If interviews from the time are right, she actually thought she making a highly positive piece, celebrating feminist discovery and self-actualization. She told Ireland Online, “The whole reason I made that movie was to say: Oh yeah, that girl you called a slut probably went through this, so you might not want to use her and throw her away or judge her.”

Ricci explained to Entertainment Weekly that she remained in her scanty wardrobe even when not shooting. “Sam [Jackson] would be like, ‘Put some clothes on!’ I was like, ‘No, you don't understand. I'm doing something important’.”

Alas, Ricci was equally disgusted by her own objectification in the movie’s promotion. She just could not understand why a film about a woman achieving salvation while wearing cut-offs and chained to a radiator would feature a picture of her wearing cut-offs and chained to a radiator.

“All the [marketing bosses] cared about was young boys going to see it,” she sniffs. Of course, some of those young boys probably took along some young girls as friends or dates and I cannot help but wonder how many of those girls, seeing such a depiction with its upbeat ending, did not end up getting a little inspired towards the very standards Ricci so deplores. If she wants to know what kind of women would promote such a standard, maybe she ought to try looking in the mirror.

Ricci’s next film is a Hollywood remake of the old anime cartoon Speed Racer. She plays the girlfriend, Trixie. That sounds like its just about her speed.

Um...
by Lunesta
slow day at the office, T.B.? And wouldn't this have more "relevance" if posted on one of the movie Frays?
Waaah
by Horus

'Christina Ricci isn't the image of perfection I imagined her to be, she actually (shudder) performs in roles that seem to contradict her beliefs...'

Grow up, she's an actor, not Mother Teresa. Actors play people they aren't. It's called "fiction." It's not always congruent with who they are as people. And sometimes they even make bad decisions.

You'll just have to get over that...

Re: Soulless Dignity….
by Demosthenes2

Well, I think there are two things there (at least in Ms. Ricci’s thinking) that may differ from your impression of it.

Ms. Ricci claims (in an interview) that one of her primary points was that the notion that if you take someone’s dignity utterly away from them—at an early point—and then continue to expect them to act in a dignified manner somehow is incongruous. This is something she talks about in the context of her work with RAIN (rape/abuse/incest national network). So I suspect that this is somewhat related (for her) to that disconnect between expectations and treatment of people. She states that she found appealing the fact that the victim wasn’t judged in the script for that early victimization that forged that disconnect between acting in a dignified away and destroyed impulse inhibition—contrary to what we in society do daily.

She also states that the ‘black snake’ is that soulless feeling that draws people downward and I believe she took the role to create greater awareness for victims who fall into these behaviors and other addictions.

I don’t think she meant it to be titillating in this instance though she has surely had some roles in that vein—have they all been without a similar context? None come to mind (I’m thinking of ‘Opposite of Sex’).

Anyway—I think there’s a difference between her context and promoting the standard… what do you think?

Relevance?
by TheBell

Hi, Lunesta. I just wanted a break from the usual hate-fest that political analysis brings these days. I just happened to read Ricci's comments in a sidebar and they struck me as amusing and ironic.

As for my choice of posting venues, this was less about cinema and more about the objectification of women in today's society as well as who/what can end up contributuing to it, even against their own wishes. And since when did this board have any special subject matter associated with it? In any case, I never regard anything posted on any board within The Fray as all that relevant. Thanks for your reply.

You Miss My Point
by TheBell

Hi, Horus. Ricci can play any role she wants. I understand perfectly no character she presents on screen necessarily reveals a single things about her own character.

My gripe is that she makes a movie that overtly objectifies her character and then wonders why so many women are drawn to objectification by soceity as an admirable thing. As you suggest, maybe this particular role was just a "bad decision" on her part but the only person who needs to "get over that" is Ricci.

Thanks for replying.

I am not certain
by Sarvis
But I think the "black snake" in the song was about something a little less, um, cerebral.
Maybe She Has a Death Wish
by TheBell

Hi, Demos. Maybe, just maybe, the DeathWish movies were intended to make us consider the alienation and hostility that could well up in any of us in the tragedy and subsequent grief of losing the things we most love in believe in. Or many the makers intended them as a thoughtful look at the changing intense nature of inner-city crime and the role of the average citizen as regards self-defense versus vigilantism. But given the way the film depicted such possible themes, do you think the director or Charles Bronson ought to be very surprised if large number of people objected to it as a violence-glorifying shoot-me-up?

Look, I think its great that Ricci is active in helping raise awareness for sex abuse victims. I’ll even believe she may have done the movie for the reasons she/you say. But a movie in which a sex addict is pulled out of her “downward spiral” by being chained up, half-naked and against her will, to a radiator? She couldn’t find a script that dealt with the issue a little less luridly? She really couldn’t imagine this was the way a bunch of Hollywood marketing guys would promote the film? She didn't believe anybody would think she “meant it to be titillating?”

Okay, then, she’s not a big phony. She’s just a well-meaning but incredibly naïve person. But my basic thesis remains – she ought to consider that her choice among roles, no matter how well-intentioned, may well be part of the inspiration for the trend among her fellow women she finds so abominable.

Re: Ricci – Objectification, Mirrors, and Speed
by apollonius...
I think the credibility of your whole premise hinges on the fact that you didn't see the movie. She's dead right about everything she said and you are using an example you've no awareness of except by hearsay to make a point on a subject where your entire interest is to find the hypocrisy. Need I say more?
Re: Chained heat.
by Demosthenes2

Well, it’s supposed to be lurid…

I suspect she means that to speak not as a model but as a cautionary statement about how when victimized you can’t expect rationale (dignified was the word she used) behavior from such a victim when they are downward spiraling. But is the victim’s irrational behavior and luridness in such a context (cautionary and degraded) the same salaciousness as ‘chained heat’?

Isn’t there a difference between that character (not a role model) and, say, the Julia Roberts ‘pretty woman’, Demi Moore ‘stripper with a heart of gold’ or Lindsay Johan stripper that are far more glamorized and white washed—and even aspired to, then the thing she seems to be protesting?

It seems different to me. I don’t think anyone thinks Ricci’s character is cool and wants to go chain themselves to a radiator anytime soon.

I take your point, but I see a slight difference there that I’m not sure matches up with the ‘death wish’ metaphor though I take your point.

Re: Ricci – Objectification, Mirrors, and Speed
by Th Paine

As I recall, that movie wasn't too bad -- not on my list of all time greats, but OK

Of course, I would pay to watch Samuel L Jackson read from the metro phone book, so take my movie review with the appropriate grain of salt!

Re: Chained heat.
by biteoftheweek

Wow

Thank you

Re: I am not certain
by Lunesta
heh, heh. That was my guess, too. You bad boy.
Only thing I can say
by Horus

...is that she didn't believe that the film in question "overtly objectified her character" but rather made a point about abuse of women through a fictional portrayal. Now, we may have different opinions about whether this film actually DOES that, but I don't think we should just assume that her motives were something other than what she says they are.

I think she felt the role was serious, not titillating, and was incensed that it was portrayed in the advertising as the latter.

FWIW

Re: Chained heat.
by Demosthenes2
Umm... sure. (What'd I do?) ;)
Page 1 of 2 (26 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML