Re: not a conspiracy to me
by
treborselpats
04/12/2008, 2:02 PM #
This is a case of trying to control cost to an unsustainable minimum. These Airworthiness Directives are sometimes vague in their instructions concerning the corrective action and its' urgency. The facts are an A.D. was issued many years back regarding this issue and after re-inspection by the FAA in which 15 of 19 planes did not meet the A.D. as written, it still does not explain the fact these aircraft have since undergone several inspections with the FAA inspectors at the facilities doing these "A", "B", and "C" checks (inspections). At each of these checks the A.D. would have been addressed.
Frankly, this just comes down to money. The money to fix the problem, the money to enforce the A.D., and the money or economic impact of grounding the planes for the airline and the U.S. economy.
If you really want to know the problem....it is the inadequate response by the federal government to the current trade imbalance and de-valuing dollar. It is impacting U.S. airlines ability to buy newer aircraft, maintain the ones they have and be profiitable with the rising costs of fuel associated with the dollar's decline. This issue is just the tip of the iceberg.