Re: Oprah Meets Cormac and Stay-At-Home Mom Jab
by
rocketj
06/07/2007, 6:10 AM #
Your Cormac McCarthy-on-Oprah column was just stunningly vacuous. I know it's "hip" to diss Oprah, but couldn't you at least have an argument, or a reason, or lacking those, the least grain of creativity? What's your point? Oprah is not the most overreducated Ph.D lit critic and McCarthy has earned a few bucks for his efforts? Wow, what revelations.
I haven't read any of McCarthy's books, but I did catch the interview, and I found him completely gracious. It's cool to hear an author you wouldn't otherwise hear speak about his work. (Salinger's greatness does not derive from his reclusiveness, by the way, but from what words he did permit to be published.)
I'm not a twit - I get your high-brow vs. middle-brow slam - you pretty much shoved it in my face, as well as other readers' - but the fact is, Oprah has got a lot of people reading the likes of Jonathan Franzen, Toni Morrison, Sidney Poitier and Cormac McCarthy. And we got to hear and see McCarthy, whereas we otherwise wouldn't have.
What in the end is wrong with being a "radio-friendly unit shifter"? As long as you don't kill yourself, and keep breathing.
I mean get a sense of proportion, here.
Bottom line, I think you're being stupidly cynical for cynicism's sake. One thing your article does for me is bolster my argument that 99.9% of what passes for "journalism" on the Web is total b.s. that a kindergartner could write.