I don't want the Clinton's back in the White House either but I don't understand this obsession bordering on fetish with attempting to discredit Clinton for this. I'm sure there was a sniper issue in Bosnia; how Clinton remembers this event just doesn't matter, does it? How would you remember it on three or four hours of sleep a night? What the hell does she stand to gain from this tall tale anyway? Nothing. So she was under sniper fire, who cares? It means nothing. And Hitchens article (I am a big fan by the way) is a supreme waste of intellect, time and bytes. Let's face it folks, Obama, Clinton and McCain are ALL LIARS - that's what we pay them for, to be supremely good liars, er politicians. Grow up. Hitchens might as well write an article about who is the worst ax murderer of all time. Chris, you hate the Clintons, we get it. Long live the Clintons.

agreed. why should clinton's lies disqualify her for prez, as Hitchens says? dumbya bush has been lying to the american people for years ("i'm a uniter, not a divider,", etc.) and yet he was elected twice to this high office. the clintons are no worse than other politicians. does hitchens hate those good years during the clinton presidency when we had peace, prosperity, and lots of good jobs?

What the hell does she stand to gain from this tall tale anyway?

What she stood to gain was padding her resume with lies about why she was more ready for the 3AM phone call than Barak.

truthbomb:

What the hell does she stand to gain from this tall tale anyway?.

What she stood to gain was padding her resume with lies about why she was more ready for the 3AM phone call than Barak.

P.S. appologize for the second posting of this. Just trying to learn how to get the quote features to work right. Hope it works this time. It didn't in the last.

What part of her resume? Oh, I see. Experience = Avoidance of Sniper Triangulation in Foreign Countries. I guess she will save us money as there will be no need for the Secret Service anymore.