I usually find slate's article's to be well reasoned, insightful and fair. This article is none of the above. The author comes across as a demicratic party mouth peice who slept through econ 101.

Introduction to Literature?

I don't really think such a class would apply here.

I usually find slate's article's to be well reasoned, insightful and fair. This article is none of the above. The author comes across as a demicratic party mouth peice who slept through econ 101.

It would be helpful if such accusations were backed up with specifics. Otherwise there's not much of substance for us to discuss.