This was probably more obscure than I thought, although it was nice to see some of you again (Howdy Deej). I probably should have posted it in the XX factor, which I think remarkably bad.
Anyway, I am a kid hugging a secret to my chest and that secret is me. I would find it awful if my public identity defined me *to myself* and distorting to oblivion if I actually desired such a thing (as XX factor seems to go. To regard all women as your sisters is disgusting. I have been thinking lately about how bizarre it is that humans manage to be tribalistic by gender, which just about *can't* divide a tribe (amazons notwithstanding). I have my tribe too, of course, but I would like that to mean something a bit more intimate. Y'know Mill's "The Subjection of Women" faults men for self-worship, but particularly, I think for self-worship of men as men. Worship yourself all you like (modern feminism as described by misogynists) but find a better reason than public knowledge of your sex organs (I'm playing locdog). I long for sentient computers, or at least aliens, to help make this distinction less coherent. Transsexuals might also manage it. No wonder I find Fritz' prattling about masculinity annoying (same schtick). Likewise, no wonder I found locdog's thinking women demeaned themselves by showing their bodies annoying (not just 'cause I'm a lib about body freedom, but 'cause what a dumb thing to imagine can demean *you*).
Note this says nothing at all about distinguishing between men and women in the public sphere or in a general sense (e.g., aid, research, etc targeted by gender mostly perfectly sensible),
Sorry to be a bore. Not to be taken seriously. . .