You mean, like actually have the judges know what they are talking about? How extreme. Think how much harder it would be for radical right wing judges to claim to be strict constructionists if the precedents were thoroughly identified BEFORE their vote, and then they voted against them.

It would be the end of a mythology in America --that right wing radicals are actually trying to CONSERVE anything. How ridiculous! Do you run around telling the emperor he's not wearing clothes?

No, no, we realize you're well intentioned, but your idea must be suppressed for the well-being of lobbyists. Bring it up again, and it's Guantanamo for you, bub.