<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/discuss/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Spectator</title><link>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/2161049/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>The Spectator</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>Give them a break . . .</title><link>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/thread/54555.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:18:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e55aff1-63ee-4857-a1e9-69fccb83d317:54555</guid><dc:creator>urban_houstonian</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/thread/54555.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=2161049&amp;PostID=54555</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;No, I'm not referring to Brad and Angelina, but the editors and writers of Esquire. I am an loyal subscriber, and had to refrain from reading the entire article, as I have not yet gotten around to the Angelina "profile". &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Esquire recently published another profile on Halle Berry that was truly spectacular in its approach; Halle wrote it. I understand what the author of this article is leaning towards, but it is a disservice to Esquire and GQ to compare them to Maxim, which is nothing more than watered down smut.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope to read the Angelina article by the end of this week. I'll come back to read this article, and see if my opinion changes.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>