<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/discuss/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Spectator</title><link>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/2161049/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>The Spectator</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>Esquire needs a spanking</title><link>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/thread/53767.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:47:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8e55aff1-63ee-4857-a1e9-69fccb83d317:53767</guid><dc:creator>katidid0913</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/thread/53767.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/discuss/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=2161049&amp;PostID=53767</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I really enjoy the content of Esquire most of the time, but lately their celebrity profiles have been incredibly weak.  The Angelina piece was a nadir, its title was "Angelina Dies for Our Sins" for crissake!  But it only barely beat out the insipid Halle Berry article from a few months ago which "boldly" turned the tables and allowed Halle to interview the interviewer, or some such piffle. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for calling Esquire on this.  I expect crappy articles like this one from other mags, but Esquire proves every month they have a staff full of bright articulate writers, except apparently when confronted by famous hot women.  &lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>