The point is, you, perhaps rightly, pick on the article for not providing any evidence to back up their claim. But where are your numbers? How do you actually know things were better under Reagan and Bush I besides your gut feeling and the fact that "you were there"? Who gives a shit? I was there too, and I thought it sucked, but that's just *my* gut feeling.

As for the how Clinton ruined the economy I don't know, please explain it to me, because it sure seemed like the economy was mostly fine until Bush II and friends f'***ed it.