Hillary claimed on the floor of the Senate that she knew there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. She knew this not only because she trusted the inf. the Bush admin. fed her but also because she was intimately involved in her husband's admin. in the 90's.

Hillary was clearly attempting to set herself apart and above potential rivals for her future run at the Presidency.

At any rate, she was either a) lying about her involvement in Bill's admin. b) lying along with George Bush, c) she was duped by someone (Bush) whom everyone claims is an idiot or d) telling the truth thereby destroying the primary argument many now use against the current President.

I'll vote for "a" that she is a liar. History bears this out quite well. Even Carl Bernstein, who liberals the world over love for his Watergate reporting, says she had and has a problem with truth-telling. "d" is a good answer too. Obama, while not as experienced, was certainly more intelligent.

I'm suprised that someone like yourself wrote such a well-crafted post would fall so deeply for the old "it depends on what 'is' is." regarding Hillary's war vote. The simple fact of the matter is that she voted for this to not be seen as cowardly or un-Presidential. How pathetic is that? At least George Bush believes his own lies.