I've seen on this forum for awhile.

Dustydragon:

< p>But on the main subject here, were do we draw the line, or is there no line to draw? Born gay, born trans, born beastal, born pedo, Once the door is cracked open its flung wide open.

You're really equating homosexual or transgendered with bestiality and pedophilia? Hard to tell if that bigotry is born of ignorance or prejudice. The only thing homosexuality has in common with bestiality and pedophilia is that all involve sexual behavior. That's all there is - engaging in one doesn't increase the likelihood that you'll engage in another, and there's no evidence that greater tolerance for homosexuals results in greater tolerance for, or higher incidence of, either pedophilia or beastiality.

And being transgendered isn't even necessarily an issue of sexual preference; gender identity and sexual preference do not necessarily coincide.

Last, while its been long acknowledged that there must be a biological underpinning to both gender identity and sexual preference (malleability has been the issue of debate), there's never been any speculation about a biological basis for pedophilia or bestiality.

The only similarity between these issues is the one you project onto it, based on your skewed conception of what is moral and natural. It's people like you that leave me wondering whether the term "nonjudgmental Christian" is in fact an oxymoron.