More Fun Than Beating Your Ex
by
riccaric
11/13/2007, 11:52 PM
BEATING HILLARY CLINTON. One
of the interesting things about the Republican Party is the principled
viciousness of right-wing activists and a lot of conservative voters.
One such South Carolina conservative got down to the brass tacks about
Hillary Clinton when she asked John McCain "how do we beat the bitch?" Talking Points Memo
focuses on McCain's response to the name-calling as "an excellent
question." But I think it's better to focus on the statement itself.
What's striking about the statement is the powerfully off-hand quality
of the woman's contempt for Hillary Clinton. In the video, "bitch" is
not a stereotype of an unpleasant or overly aggressive woman or a term
of opposition. Rather, the pejorative thrust of the conservative
woman's use of the term in relation to Hillary Clinton was to treat
Clinton as sub-human, as somebody who could not be imagined as equal in
dignity to anybody in the room. What's "principled" about this kind of
viciousness is the refusal to recognize Hillary Clinton as a worthwhile
being. It was much like the principled refusal of slave owners and
segregationists to recognize the humanity of black people. For this
Republican woman, "bitch" was the female version of a racial epithet
like the n-word.
In this context, the use of the term "beat
the bitch" has an ambivalent meaning in the sentence as a whole. The
primary connotation is to defeat Hillary but there's a strong secondary
connotation of "beating" as in physically beating Hillary or in
visiting upon her a humiliation and degradation that Hillary would
deserve as a sub-human "bitch." The implied violence is captured by
another person in the room who jokes that "she's talking about my
ex-wife" and the idea of "beating my ex-wife." The implied violence
deepens the racial analogy. Asking "how do we beat the bitch" is the
functional equivalent of asking "how do we keep blacks in their place."
Except that conservatives are not so nice as to use the term "black."
And the implied answer to that question is "with all the violence we
need."
GIULIANI'S APPEAL. As I've already mention, Talking Points Memo
emphasized McCain's agreement with the questioner in calling the
question an "excellent question." Actually, that's not the case. True,
McCain did break up in laughter over the question. But he also made
important gestures to reincorporate Hillary Clinton into
symbolic humanity. Most significantly, he referred to Hillary by a name
as "Sen. Clinton." By referring to her name, McCain brought the
discussion out of the stock symbolism of bigotry and into a world where
people can compete and disagree without dehumanizing to the nth degree.
In that context, he could then talk about his respect for her and his
respect for the Democratic Party despite his many disagreements.
But
that probably wasn't the answer that McCain's questioner was looking
for. To find the "right" right-wing answer, she's going to have to look
at Rudy Giuliani. According to the Wall Street Journal, Rudy Giuliani appeals to Republicans primarily because of his carefully calculated image of "confidence" and strength."
"It's
all about leadership," says Scott Reed, a Republican strategist who ran
Bob Dole's 1996 campaign but is unaffiliated this time around. "It's
all about him being a tough guy who won't take c--- from anyone. Social
conservatives have embraced this and have overlooked the traditional
issues of life, marriage and the Second Amendment for the guy," Mr.
Reed adds.
To be more precise, not taking "crap" means
"dishing out a lot of crap" without "apologizing" for it. It means that
Rudy is going to engage in a lot of insults and put-downs as ways to
display his aggression. As Giuliani has shown with his fibs about
health policy, he's not going to care much about the
accuracy of his claims and that he's especially not going to back down
on any of his inaccurate claims. Like Bush, Giuliani will also refuse
to disown the inevitable smear campaigns against Hillary and view them
as "just politics."
And that's what Republican voters want to
see. They want to see Republican candidates "beat" and humiliate
Hillary Clinton as well as defeat her in the election. They want to
"beat the bitch" with insults, innuendo, and smears and they want to
feel good about the beatings they dish out to her.
And Giuliani is doing his best to project himself as the guy who's going to make Republicans feel good.
THE PROSPECT. To
the extent that Giuliani or another Republican nominee refers his
insults and innuendo to real missteps on the part of Hillary Clinton,
they have a chance to succeed. But I don't think they're going to have
that much self-discipline. Following the example of McCain's
questioner, the Republicans will attempt to give Hillary Clinton a
"beating." And I think that's going to backfire with a lot of women and
moderate voters who are much more suspicious of the right than they are
of Hillary.