You might want to read these books before taking on journals:

I am willing to wager you've never read a journal topic on the subject matter. Those books (or at least their content) has been debated and debunked many times by the scientific community.

These are the facts, no matter how much you'd love them to be otherwise.

1) There is no consensus on what intelligence is. The science that will deliver that answer is neuroscience. And it hasn't.

2) We have no idea how IQ relates to intelligence in general. We don't really know what IQ measures.

3) We have no idea why some studies break down along racial lines but we do know that there is (and has been) inherent bias in the testers and tests. There have been skewed and manipulated results. Many factors could explain any bias. The most pointed out factors here and elsewhere are cultural norms, histories of oppression, poverty rates and so on.

I would suggest sir that you came by your opinions first and your evidence afterwards. You bring science's good name into disrepute.