Although I agree that Notre Dame sucks, it's too easy to make this point while contradicting yourself.

"It's true that Notre Dame has suffered a dip in its talent level, attributable to poor recruiting by Weis' predecessor Tyrone Willingham."

"This first season was seen as the start of a new dynasty. In truth, Notre Dame was bound to improve, given the natural maturation of a couple of excellent Willingham recruiting classes."

How can a article print both of these quotes and still retain any credibility.