Why should they when the state broke the agreement? It was the city's rules that put BSA into this problem. BSA did nothing wrong by having their rules regarding homosexual scoutmasters, even the Supreme Court sided with the BSA about this. The city changed the rules, and they want the BSA to bend to them.

Besides it doesn't make sense to penalize someone when you have commited the wrong. The building was 'owned' by the city, the BSA were just using part of the building rent free. They never said, TAX free. And istn't he BSA a not for profit organization? Could've sworn those groups were exempt from alot of taxes.