LOL! You sure do project alot when you are cornered. Yes, you made some semantic arguments that I pointed out do not hold up. And then you accused me of calling you names and began whining. And so now I'm the asshole because you can't support your argument but with razor thin, guilt-by-association-type, semantic bait and switch games. It's the oldes trick inthe book.

Here is your argument: You: Atheism is just a religion. Me: Um, no it's not. Not really. You: Yes it is so if you think religion is dumb, then you must be dumb too cuz atheism is the same thing, snort. Me: Well, I realize that based on the definition of the word religion you can make that semantic arument, but that doesn't give them equal odds of being true or make them the same thing. You: Quit calling me names!

You know they are not the same. The odds of a magic sky God existing or not is not 50-50 and just as likely as not. But is makes you feel special to try and tie up a rational discussion with nonsense like this.

:)