Works (sort of) as a (weak) semantic argument and no doubt scores you a few points on these boards, but still, it is glib to conclude that because a semantic argument can be made lumping it (Atheism) in with the category of God-centric, supernatural, "faiths," that it is even remotely the same as those others or as unlikely to be true as they are. I know you think it makes you oh so clever, but it really doesn't help the case for the existence of a magical sky God snapping "his" fingers and creating stuff out of thin air. People just need to learn to just say, "I don't know and I'm fine with that," rather than just making up any old crazy shit just to have an answer for things they don't understand.