in responses from posters from all over the political map, your positions here are full of unexamined assumptions and internal contradictions. You can expect some pointers from a loaded question that demonstrates huge gaps in your understanding and education, and you've gotten some. That won't substitute for being well-informed and making more than a superficial attempt to understand other arguments.

I'll start with this:

But lets leave that aside for a moment, you enjoy chiding Democrats for policies that can be described as socialist because the Democrats are concerned with the social welfare of Americans. Yet you seem to have no problems embracing the communist Chinese who are genuinely threatening the United States.

Both sentences are wrong, and the first has at least three errors. First, I don't enjoy chiding Democrats or anyone else. (I confess that I sometimes enjoy chiding people who exhibit certain personality traits, behaviors, or styles of communication, but that has little to do with the policies that they advocate). Second, I chide Republicans sometimes (although less often than Democrats right now admittedly). Third, I don't chide people for promoting social policies because those people are concerned with social welfare of Americans (or anyone else); I think everyone should be concerned about the social welfare of all other people, not only Americans. When I chide people for promoting socialist policies it is because I believe that the policies I'm chiding them about actually harm the people they claim to be trying to "protect".

The second sentence is wrong more than once as well. First because it poorly expresses what you mean, and second because what you mean to say is wrong. I don't embrace communism, nor the Chinese in particular. The fact that I detest communism doesn't imply that I think we should refuse to trade with them to our mutual benefit. I also distinguish between the Chinese government and 1 billion Chinese people who have the same needs, hopes, and dreams that you and I do. Finally, I rather doubt that even the Chinese government genuinely threatens the US. For one thing, they've lent us a lot of money and probably are hoping to get most of it back. For another, if they damage our economy, who will buy MP3 players and designer jeans from them?

The rest of your reply is mostly nonsense. Can you give specific examples of human rights abuses being committed by India today? If you do have any such examples, can you demonstrate how us stopping trade with India would help the people being abused?

All that is probably too much, so here's a simpler question for you to chew on. Why are you more concerned about the well-being of an American worker making $20.00 per hour than that of a Chinese worker getting paid $5.00 per day?