flrdalyn:

the fact that she willingly went with him, willingly took the drugs, willingly took off her clothes and that she supposedly wasn't a virgin even though she said no numerous times, would cast some "reasonable doubt" even at this time.

Yea, I get it. She asked for it. Willingly, and it only took her thirteen short years to scheme the downfall of a great man.

one thing I do know without a reasonable doubt is that your an imbecile disguised as a "let me explain something to you". Geez, and it only took you two paragraphs to convince me.

Actually it seems like you may be the imbecile. Maybe you should have read the whole post instead of just taking the last paragraph out of context or maybe you have some problems with actual reading comprehension. I was replying to the post by Jazz where he claims that the DA did not consider it rape because he pled it down since he doesn't seem to understand what a plea deal is about. I saw what a defense attorney did to a rape victim in the 70's and I saw how some of the people in the jury believed that she deserved it. Where did I say in that post that "I" felt that she deserved it? I in no way agree that she deserved it or that the way the defense attorneys used to treat rape victims was right. Unfortunately it was a travesty that was allowed to happen at that time and as I said that is a possible reason as to why the DA never took it to trial and pled it down to something else.