You'll notice that no one has answered your question. Every response has been some form of distraction or counter-attack - "well, it's not that simple!"

The fact is, insuring everyone would mean adding insurance for 40-50 people. No one has comptetently demonstrated how this could be done without massive expenditures. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office came in with a price tag fo rthe Public Option that was incredibly high - one of the things that drove opposition to the plan. Without using actual numbers, some supporters have said that cutting inefficiency will pay for it, which is impossible. Even if the entire insurance industry were done away with, no more than 20% of the current cost of health care would be eliminated.

In fact, a "health care for all" push does come with a price tag. The question is, who would pay for it. Those who believe health care to be a right would say, I don't care how, just pay for it. Raise taxes or borrow money, but whatever you do, just "think of the po' chilluns."

The fact that no one has answered your question is quite telling.