the beyatles:

Prytania3:

I happen to think, by the way, that John Mayer's instrumental work is pleasant enough--I'd be happy to go see him (if you gave me free tickets) if he'd just agree to play and not open his mouth to mewl.

But anyone who compares John "Your Torso is an Amusing Place" Mayer with the Beatles is not onlya fanboy but a troll who thinks rather too much of his own skills as a debater.

And, based on the evidence available "In these days of YouTube," Liszt was a sucky pianist, wuddent he?

Oh for sure. same goes for Satie. Oh, and John Coltrane. My ACTUAL favorite music..."artist". Even though all he did was basically reinvent chords and use different scales. which are only reasons that the wanna bes like me use. Whereas real musicianship is reflected in "waiting on the world to change" and Jimi covers. But Hey!!! Johnny supports the blues!! (even if he doesn't, you know, FUCKING PLAY THE BLUES. Or write the songs. But Howlin' wolf rules. even if he can't play like (heart flutter) Joooooohhhhnnnnnnnnn!!!)

Not a fanboy. You clearly don't even understand what the word means. But I do think he is a good player, and definitely better than any member of the Beatles.

Why don't you try and give a definition of the blues. Can you? Without trying to look it up? Because you clearly don't know ANYTHING at all about music. But keep spouting all your nonsense if it makes you feel like you know something. And keep listening to your vinyl records, because that somehow proves you know something about music, or anything at all for that matter.

And which Jimi Cover did he do now? California Dreamin was the "mommas and pappas" if thats what you're referring to.