LOL. First I presume that the libs are more likely than conservatives to already be aware of this, so I don't get the subject line.

But your comment on being discriminating --- HO! Well said, indeed. A dang shame the man didn't know that for a small fee, he could pick up some electrical gadgets that he could have used in his own PRIVATE bathroom. If he and his spouse aren't capable of discussing or dealing with such things as the occasional "need", he might still have run the risk of upsetting her. But surely it would have been less traumatic and overwhelmingly destructive than what he DID do.

It's why I suspect the man to have "reasons" for taking the route he did, which are likely to be rooted in his titillation factor being higher, the more he thumbed his nose at his own self-righteous lawmaking. Totally not the same thing as being gay, but "discriminating"? I'd have said UN ...