First, these are not "my words" and you're not only disingenuous but blatantly dishonest in saying so. When you take three words from a sentence out of context and then surround them with your own perverted interpretation of what they mean, you can no longer call them someone else's words. Not honestly at least. Second, your link appears to be another government funded study that got the results it paid for. I look at this study with extreme skepticism and wonder whether what has been identified is actually a disease, based on statements such as... "bullous lung disease can easily go undetected as patients suffering from the disease may show normal chest X-rays and lung functions...chest X-rays and lung functions were normal in half of them." The article never discussed what the actual "harm" from this supposed disease is, beyond "breathing obstruction" which could mean almost anything, nor how many are suffering or have died from it. It looks like more pay-to-play science to me. If this disease causes "eventual destruction of the lungs" then where is the correlation between smoking marijuana and death from the disease. After all, there must be many people that have died this way if it is as destructive as they make it out to be. Where's the proof?