Too many people have forgotten the true danger of nuclear weapons. It is not that terrorists will (yes, will -
no matter how we struggle against it, someone, sometime will get the
materials or a preassembled bomb) flatten a city. No, the truly
terrible thing is that we are never more than thirty minutes away from
the end of modern northern-hemisphere civilization.
I'm a little
over thirty years old, which is old enough to remember going to sleep
at night genuinely, legitimately worried that you might not wake
up... because of that five-megaton airburst above a known target ten
miles up the road. Having done some study of this subject in my college
years, I understand the multiple erroneous assumptions about nuclear
war in the 80's that that statement embodies... but if the flag had
gone up, I still would have been immediately downwind and while I
undoubtedly would have woken up, I would have been dead within 48
hours And while people would survive in the US and Soviet Union,
anything more (or even perceived to be more, and how much can
be accurately perceived in that ten minute decision-making period
leaders would have before the missiles started landing can not be
determined... except by actually trying it) than a pure counter-force
launch by either side would permanently leave both nations crippled,
the majority of their populations dead or walking-dead.
When the Iron Curtain rusted apart, we celebrated, but not
because we really gave much of a damn if the Czechs could elect a poet
or the Germans could run Oktoberfest without that pesky wall through
the middle. We cheered because we knew that something resembling
a democratic government in Russia was much less likely to engage in
global military chest-thumping which might trigger nuclear
escalation. We could go to bed at night, not half-expecting the
nuclear alarm-clock to wake us up.
Today I am... not really
worried in the same way I was in my youth, but I can see the
possibilities out there. If Russia under Yeltsin resembled a democratic
government, Russia under Putin these days resembles a Soviet-style
government-by-bureaucracy pretending (very badly) to resemble a
democracy. It's not quite alarming yet, and if Putin really steps down
as his second term ends there's a chance that the next leader will have
the wisdom to step back, to build something better than the kleptocracy
that Russia has become... and maybe Dubya will withdraw from Iraq
before his second term ends.
Yeah, right.
Even a
non-democratic Russia need not be our enemy, but it could become one in
a real hurry, and my fear is that the utter inefficiencies in their
joke of an economy will leave them permanently poor and resentful...and
sitting on a legacy of nuclear weapons from the "glory years" of the
previous era. The one positive is at least they lack the conventional
military power to project enough force to make direct confrontation an
inevitability. Soviet conventional strategy always emphasized quantity,
but back in the day they were seldom more than a decade behind in
technological terms. The Russian military today is a joke with a lot of
badly-trained manpower and no credible way it can attack anyone (except
with its nukes) who's not a next-door neighbor. Unless they try
conquering Ukraine or Estonia or something (and they can't - Europe
could stop them, even without our help) our forces and theirs simply
will never butt heads.
If we're not shooting at them or their
immediate proxies, the Russians will never have adequate reason to push
the button. Even the proverbial gung-ho military commander
under the mountain with all of Russia's nuclear might at his fingertip
will not be inclined to punish the US if it was the Chechens who did
Moscow.
I said I was worried, and I am, but it's by a couple of
extreme scenarios of which there are no signs of near-term
emergence.
The first and more realistic one is the
development of a Nazi-like expansionist, fascist culture in Russia. The
details of whatever ideology would underly this are irrelevant, but a
charismatic leader with dreams of reconquering the Soviet empire and
enough popular support to stamp out the corruption crippling the
economy and the patience to remake the military into a real weapon
could turn Russia into a threat which would make the old communist
manifest destiny look like my teddy bear.
...and yes, that's a silly nightmare scenario, except
that most of the ingredients for it are already in place. Russia is
becoming a single-party state again, and the opposition is almost
criminalized. Putin and company have centralized control of much
of the media, limiting the voices that much of the country hears.
Russia lost its last great war (the cold war), and while it is a
stretch to say the nation resents that fact there is a detectable and
explotable (I would argue already exploited) inferiority complex in
play. And despite the repression and crushing of democratic reform,
Putin and his government remain immensely popular.
Still, in this
worst case a truly hostile Russia is at least a decade away, and
everything has to go wrong. Disturbing trends, but I'm not losing
sleep.
The second scenario that worries me is perhaps best
defined as "mistaken launch on incomplete information". That has
an easy sound to it: something bad happens, and because the person
under the mountain doesn't know all the context, the button gets
pushed. But in the real world, it's not nearly that simple - the
person under the mountain is one of the very-best informed persons in
the world. He has to be, since the fate of his nation (the world
doesn't matter here, just the nation) rests under his finger and no
nation is going to give that power to a blind man. Furthermore,
pressing that button is tantamount to personal suicide - a mountain is
not adequate protection against repeated megaton-level ground
penetrator strikes, it just means you get to watch the end of the world
a little longer than most - so that person has to be motivated enough
to do it, and a "maybe" is not very motivating.
The real danger here is someone being thrust into that position
with incomplete knowledge of things that are already underway. There
was a decent novel on this premise written in the mid-90's named Arc Light,
which supposed a Russian coup in the middle of a Russia-China war that
was just starting to go nuclear... and some other messy circumstances
which would take too long to explain. But the general idea of
someone coming into power and mistaking the signs of a nuclear attack
is possible... just horribly, horribly unlikely in terms of
timing. Coups don't happen that often (though the structures of
government Russia is developing make a coup more likely) and
"signs of nuclear war" are both pretty damned distinct and even more
unlikely. This is the sort of thing that makes transparency and
international review of command and control structures desirable, even
at such a low probability.
Not something to keep you awake into the night, unless you go see a scary movie based on it.
That
said, I do worry for the long term. Terrorist nukes are not going
to be able to wipe out a nation. (Okay, Lichtenstein. But
that's a bad joke.) But a large nuclear exchange between nations
will always be a possibility as long as technological civilization
exists, and it behooves all of us to educate ourselves on the issues,
armaments, and scenarios involved with threats of that scale. I
don't believe that total disarmament will ever occur - the incentives
for keeping a nuclear inventory are simply too great.
Remember, this technology will be with us forever. Or until it kills us. I hope that it has your attention.
...all
that said (and boy did I say more than I intended), I'm less than
impressed by the "doomsday machine" this article is talking
about. As best as I can parse, this is not a Strangelovian
super-cobalt-salted bomb somewhere in Russia (which itself doesn't
quite pass the smell test under my (better-than-average but admittedly
limited) understanding of the possibilities of nuclear armaments) but
just a fallback launch/PAL system.with strong automatic
components. I will search out some of the references here - as my
main argument stated, we need to know what's out there.
But something that's not fully automatic just doesn't scare me, for
reasons treated above. Just another over-sensational
headline. Been a lot of those around here lately.
-Ked