Re: cognitive dissonance...this author has it in spades
by
White Camry
02/12/2009, 1:14 PM
Kikz,
How many deaths can a country die? You must have counted the ways.
You've been sold the South's own wound-licking post-war propaganda. Slavery was indeed the South's premiere cause for secession - so said their own pre- and early-war propaganda. Such a pity they couldn't find a worthy cause.
I mentioned nothing about reparations for slave owners; those monsters
deserved precisely what they ultimately got - zilch. I said "eminent
domain," whereby instead of secession they would demand Federal cash
for the manumission of their slaves. It would have been a far more
lucrative course. But, of course, that notion eluded them then, as it
eludes you now.
Lincoln did indeed care about slavery but in 1861 was willing to
forego abolition if the South voluntarily quit secession, which only
goes to show the unworth of appeasing hotheads. In 1862 he owned up to reality.
Right or wrong - you take your pick, I'll take mine - secession was
also politically and strategically imbecilic for leaving the U.S. Government entirely in
the hands of the North. The Morril tariff was in March 1861, after seven states had
seceded and thus depriving the Southern faction of the U.S. Senate 14
votes (those hotheads, again - just no talking to them.)
Btw, how did such "oppressive" tariffs pass a 50%-Southern U.S. Senate?