Gladly. Duckandcover states that all religion is irrational and that choosing one over another is just a matter of "choosing your poison". His belief is that science answers (or debunks) all questions that religion has heretofor accounted for. I have no problem with science and its use to answer questions of this earth, but when we begin dealing in conjecture are we not teetering on the edge of faith? If a scientist can call my faith "irrational" then I can say the same of his. Sounds a little like religious debate, no?