Horus, I listened to the speech. I say it lacked specifics. Talking about issues is not discussing specifics. He said he would review every program and cut the ones that "don't work." That sounds nice, but it is entirely devoid of a) his criteria for what "works" and, more importantly, b) examples of *any* government programs in the entire universe of the federal government that he would cut.

And saying he wants "more accountability" for teachers...that's not an education policy. That's just more rhetoric. Does he support merit pay? What about firing underperforming teachers?