efraker:

Let me question something you certainly have said, repeatedly. You continually note that the mother denies Edward's paternity and that another man claims it. Why should their statements have any value? Is the benefit they stand to ostensibly gain not completely obvious?

No. Exactly what benefit is there to saying he isn't the father? If he were the father and they had evidence to show it, there is much more incentive to come out and say it rather than hide it.

On top of that, it is highly unusual for a man to claim paternity to a child that isn't his. It's good to have an open mind...but not so open that your brain falls out. There would have to be a huge incentive to convince a man to claim a child that isn't his. Is there any evidence of such?

What do you mean you haven't looked?

And you expect to be taken seriously when you haven't done your homework?

Here's a thought: Why don't you hold up until you have some evidence? You know, go out and do some investigation. No, it can't be done through Google and picking up the latest Drudge report. You'll have to go out and do some real work. Until then, there is no story.