enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Re: Anthrax too convenient
by penguin15

If he were truly a victim, why did it take 7 years to get to him? He's not a scapegoat. "You don't want to know the truth"...get over yourself. You're so full of crap that you contradict yourself constantly. "Cell phones don't work in the air" (they do), "steel doesn't melt" (it weakens at 450 degrees and up), "it was a missile that hit the Pentagon" (security footage shows a plane).

Your "truth" is just like the "truth" we never landed on the moon...despite overwhelming evidence, you're not convinced. That sounds like YOU are the one living in a fantasy world, where the gov't is out to get you.

Fact: Ivins spent way too many afterhours in the lab working on anthrax, and never documented any of it. Fact: The strain of anthrax is tied to him and him alone. For your theory to be true, someone else would have to be working on anthrax with the same strain (that's like saying someone else has your exact DNA -- it doesn't happen).

You have no scientific basis for your claims, so just go away. Your whole point is that the gov't is lying and caused 9/11, anthrax, and every other ill in society. How many people do they have working on these things? I love how YOU are the only one with the truth....brilliant. Just like those wackos that think aliens landed on Earth, but we could never land on the moon. Hilarious. Keep dreamin', buddy. Even without any evidence. It's been 7 years...you'd think that if Bush could really control all of this, that he would've been successful in all of the invasions, etc. So he blew up towers, created anthrax, and invaded Afghanistan 8 months into his administration, but has done nothing since???

You're delusional.

View complete thread