government dividing stuff up to the unworthy....as opposed to YOU dividing stuff up to the worthy...and be very social.

Opposing government in the divving up your stuff isn't "anti-social", it is recognition that there are better ways to do it.

Now, if you are completely "miserly" if the government leaves your wealth alone...then you might have an argument about that person being "anti-social".

Funny how most information shows that the poor and the conservative give more to charity as a percentage of their wealth...than the liberal "pro-socialists" do.