Re: No such 'simple to complex' axis is required
by
yart
07/22/2008, 11:35 AM
oh, right, now I get it. if a monkey becomes a man it evolves....if a man becomes a monkey he evolves too. but since there is no evidence that either of those evolutions has occurred I guess I guess there is still room for debate. a single cell organism becomes a man....a man becomes a single cell organism...impossible you say? Nothing is impossible for God. That man was created out of the dust of the earth...impossible. No, we went through that before. some erstwhile physical therapist says that atrophy of an organ is not passed on....tell the blind salamander that. two seeing salamanders( male and female) locomote themselves to a dark spot for a romantic twist....no, not misspelled....they conclude and try to find their way back in the dark but only go deeper and deeper into the seemingly bottomless pit....they never see the light of day again....the offspring from their union is born with eyes but since they never see any light they overtime become useless....this is certainly not monkey to man evolution which is what Kitch...Hitchens wants to proclaim...indirectly of course, by debunking Genesis....make all the definitions you want and believe them to your peril.