enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Re: No Kev you're wrong
by KevClark64

"you create the conundrum that compelling a woman to carry the fetus to term is indistinguishable from Involuntary Servitude, which is explicitly prohibited action on the part of The Government."

Can you quote a case in which the majority of the Supreme Court has held that pregnancy is involuntary servitude? That's certainly not what Roe held, since it says the state has an interest in the fetus at some point, which interest would be moot if the Constitution prohibits such an interest. Is there another case which overturned Roe and established your reading of the Constitution?

View complete thread