so then it stands that if adhering to the rules of language makes it more difficult to communicate or understand the communication of others, then it is thwarting its own purpose.

For example: txt-talk, as in "c u ltr", while not adhering to traditional structures of language, facilitates communication.

In this case, several folks posted to this thread showing a perfect understanding of what I meant, while you(certainly a linguistic guru) were not able to understand it.

The purpose needs no refinement. The purpose is to be able to successfully communicate with others. Some communication requires improvisation to emphasize a point quickly.

The world is comprised of both order and chaos. Adhering to one while not understanding the other is a counterproductive philosophy.