"Much like Ann Coulter, I doubt that Mr. Engberger believes a single thing he has written here."

If I were you I would not underestimate the lunacy of Ms. Coulter. But I don't see what the problem is with Mr. Engber's article. It was no doubt one of the silliest, least grounded in fact pieces I have read in a long time (and I have stated previously in a seperate thread that this piece made me laugh out loud and for quite some time). But I don't see what the big deal is. It's plain ignorance seems to reflect that of most of the writers in the Fray. So I have a question, not directed to the originator of this topic: Why hate one of your own ignoramuses?