It's ironic that Miss Schaffer accuses her targets of over simplifying, and then makes broad and rather self-serving generalizations to come to her pre-ordained conclusion. Its also rather funny, in the article on Larry Summers, that Miss Schaffer refers to Summers' point that male IQ scores are more variable than female scores, and then uses content-based tests to try to prove him wrong. I wonder if Miss Schaffer realizes the difference between an IQ test and a math test, or language test, or geography test, etc.? Or maybe she willfully misunderstood the point so that she could argue against a straw man. Sign Miss Schaffer up for the XX factor!