Linking a NYT editorial that catalogs ways Obama has reversed himself on several positions -- and we're not talking minor adjustments in, say, proposed capital gains tax rates or mpg standards, but rather betraying an earlier promise to defend the Constitution and Rule of Law against the FISA "compromise" (nothing of the sort) abomination -- doesn't get any more fundamental than that -- as supporting an argument that "Obama's the real deal".

Weird (guess I'm suggesting you might need to define "real deal")!

P.S. You can join mybarackobama.com supporters' group "Senator Obama - Please Vote NO on Telecom Immunity - Get FISA Right" here.

Hard to imagine a more relevant and fundamental test of "real deal"ness than following through on -- instead of reversing -- a prior commitment (while wooing primary voters) to defend the Constitution and Rule of Law.