What an asinine response.

Elizabeth was saying Dickerson "needs" to read the book to put the commercial in context. In other words, unlike the entirety of yoru comment, it was relevant to Dickerson's original article. It was not a literary recommendation. But hey, at least it gave you a chance to namedrop Sun Tzu and Orwell. Color me impressed.

Do you know anything about what John Edwards has given, or not given, to scholarship funds and other charities? I suspect you don't. I don't either. But I know he's done more for poor people than every Republican candidate combined. And I'm certain he's done far more than you have, by orders of magnitude.